Summary Table
Type | Description | Advantages | Disadvantages |
Dog |
Allowed by law. It is considered the best method. Feeling dog –man and passion in hunting. |
Accuracy in identifying. Minimally invasive to the environment. The dog digs only the ripe product (except in rare cases). |
The dog is not a robot, you have to know how to handle, it gets tired and it is not infallible. Cost of ownership of the animal. |
Pig |
Not allowed by law. Archaic method, the oldest. Nice to see. | The pig’s sense of smell is higher than the dog probably. |
Invasive and harmful to the environment. Difficult to handle and it eats the truffles. Difficulties in transport. High cost of ownership. |
Fly |
Not specified in Italy, the law only talk about the dog. French method. | Minimally invasive. |
Can be used only at certain times of the year. It needs a lot of passion and skill. Too slow and difficult to apply. |
Olfactometer / Electronic Nose | Method in experimental stage. |
Minimally invasive. There are not the problems of duration as in dogs. |
Difficulty of instrument calibration. Overall dimensions of the equipment. No passion and interaction. |
Digging |
It is forbidden by the law. This is the method used by the poachers, especially during night. | You can find everything that is underground. |
The probability of dig without finding anything is much higher than the other methods. It destroys the environment and you can break/cut the truffle. Risk to collect the immature product. |